New ID laws could delay outcome of close election
In a tight race, VOTER FRAUD could decide the outcome of the Presidential (and other) election. With the DEMS up and arms and down right appalled at the actual idea of requiring voters to have identification who do you think is more likely to cheat? And speaking of cheating, how much should we trust electronic balloting that is being counted by a corporation of globalist bankers out of Spain known as Scytl?
AP
Consider what Scytl does to American voting:
· 900 jurisdictions within the US will have their votes counted remotely in Spain.
· There will be no paper trail of physical evidence of those votes.
· The system has been hacked by a group of college students.
· The major stockholders of the company are globalist bankers.
· Scytl has distinct financial ties to the previous Obama campaign.
Read more about Scytl:
Obama's Spanish Ace in the hole
Voting Integrity? Scytl and Snopes Cover up
Stealing the Election
Florida defies Holder, continues to purge voter rolls.
Obama's Spanish Ace in the hole
Voting Integrity? Scytl and Snopes Cover up
Stealing the Election
Florida defies Holder, continues to purge voter rolls.
AP
WASHINGTON
(AP) -- The presidential election is Nov. 6, but it could take days to
figure out the winner if the vote is close. New voting laws are likely
to increase the number of people who have to cast provisional ballots in
key states.
Tight races for Congress,
governor and local offices also could be stuck in limbo while election
officials scrutinize ballots, a scenario that would surely attract
legions of campaign lawyers from both parties.
"It's
a possibility of a complete meltdown for the election," said Daniel
Smith, a political scientist at the University of Florida.
Voters
cast provisional ballots for a variety of reasons: They don't bring
proper ID to the polls; they fail to update their voter registration
after moving; they try to vote at the wrong precinct; or their right to
vote is challenged by someone.
These voters
may have their votes counted, but only if election officials can verify
that they were eligible to vote, a process that can take days or weeks.
Adding to the potential for chaos: Many states won't even know how many
provisional ballots have been cast until sometime after Election Day.
Voters
cast nearly 2.1 million provisional ballots in the 2008 presidential
election. About 69 percent were eventually counted, according to
election results compiled by The Associated Press.
New
election laws in competitive states like Virginia, Florida,
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin will probably increase the number of
provisional ballots in those states this year, according to voting
experts, although the new laws in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are being
challenged in court.
New voter ID laws in
states like Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina and Tennessee could
affect state or local elections, though some of those laws also are
being challenged.
Provisional ballots don't
get much attention if an election is a landslide. But what if the vote
is close, as the polls suggest in the race between President Barack
Obama and Republican Mitt Romney?
Most of
today's voting nightmares go back to Florida in 2000, when the results
of balloting and thus the winner of the presidential contest were not
known for weeks after Election Day. Questions about recount
irregularities and the validity of ballots with hanging chads - paper
fragments still attached to punch-card ballots - preceded the eventual
declaration that George W. Bush had won the state by 537 votes and was
the next president.
"In a close election, all
eyes are going to be on those provisional ballots, and those same
canvassing boards that were looking at pregnant chads and hanging chads
back in 2000," Smith said. "It's a potential mess."
The
federal election law passed in response to the 2000 presidential
election gives voters the option to cast a provisional ballot, if poll
workers deny them a regular one. New voter ID laws could slow the count
even more.
In Virginia and Wisconsin, voters
who don't bring an ID to the polls can still have their votes counted if
they produce an ID by the Friday following Election Day. Pennsylvania's
law gives voters six days to produce an ID.
In
Ohio, which has competitive races for both president and the Senate,
provisional voters have up to 10 days following the election to bring an
ID to the county board of elections.
If
voters in Florida don't bring an ID to the polls, they must sign a
provisional ballot envelope. Canvassing boards then will try to match
the signatures with those in voter registration records, a process that
conjures up images of the 2000 presidential election in Florida.
"Americans
have gotten used to the expectation that you could turn on the TV and
you would know that night who won the election, even after Florida in
2000," said Edward B. Foley, a law professor at Ohio State University.
"But this could be an election in which we don't know the answer for
several days."
Florida could see a big
increase in provisional ballots because the state has tightened its
change-of-address requirements. This year, voters who move from one
county to another in Florida without updating their voter registration
will have to cast provisional ballots. In previous elections, they could
change their address on Election Day and cast a regular ballot.
Four
years ago, Florida voters cast about 36,000 provisional ballots. About
half of them were eventually counted, though the percentages varied
greatly from county to county.
This year, Florida could have 300,000 provisional ballots, said Michael McDonald, an election expert at George Mason University.
"You want to see chaos in Florida? There it is," McDonald said.
In
Ohio, address changes were the biggest reason voters cast provisional
ballots in 2008, said Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted. Ohio voters
cast about 207,000 provisional ballots in the 2008 presidential election
- second only to California. About 130,000 of them were cast because
voters moved and didn't update their voter registration, Husted said.
In
2004, the number of provisional ballots cast in Ohio was larger than
President George W. Bush's margin of victory over Democrat John Kerry.
Kerry didn't concede until the following morning, when the provisional
ballot picture became clear.
In 2008, the
number of provisional ballots cast in North Carolina was larger than
Obama's margin of victory over Republican John McCain. The Associated
Press didn't declare the state for Obama until the day after Election
Day, though Obama had already won enough states to claim the presidency.
Husted
said his office is trying to reduce the number of provisional ballots
in Ohio by using change-of-address information from the Postal Service
to send out more than 300,000 postcards to Ohio voters, reminding them
to update their registration.
"If we can
potentially reduce the number of ballots cast provisionally, then you
lessen the likelihood that there will have to be a prolonged process as
it relates to those ballots," Husted said. "Understand, a provisional
ballot is a second chance because you didn't do it right the first time,
meaning that you didn't update your address, you didn't bring in the
proper form of ID, there's something that the voter didn't do at the
onset that prevented them from voting a regular ballot."
---
Associated Press writer Connie Cass and AP election research coordinator Christina Bryant contributed to this report.